The agreement reached to resume navigation through the Strait of Hormuz raised short-term hopes of easing the energy crisis, but realities on the ground indicate that restoring normal shipping may take longer. The US president confirmed that oil flows will be restored on both sides, but the situation on the ground is full of technical and military complications. The most pressing threat is the possible presence of naval mines in the vital corridor, although dozens of ships have transited it during the fighting without reported incidents.
According to US intelligence, Iran may possess an arsenal of up to 5,000 naval mines, from simple drifting models to modern bottom mines with multi-channel sensor systems. Such variety greatly complicates detection and neutralization, since some mines rest on the seabed, camouflaging themselves among rocks and debris. The presence of delayed-action mechanisms and acoustic sensors or "ship counters" only increases the difficulty of clearing the strait.
The US Navy is preparing large-scale sweeping operations, covering air, surface and depths in search of potential mines. The strategy increasingly relies on unmanned aerial vehicles, helicopters and underwater drones to detect and localize targets without risking crewed vessels. The Navy has replaced most traditional Avenger-class minesweepers with steel coastal ships, which stay away from suspicious areas and use unmanned platforms in their stead.
Technical difficulties persist despite advances in equipment, because modern mines can hide and operate with multiple detection systems, or go to depths that avoid sweeping gear. Chief engineer Scott Savitz of the RAND Corporation noted: "This is extremely exhausting work. If the mines lie on the bottom, you have to distinguish them from rocky outcrops, wreckage in busy channels and debris dumped at sea for decades or centuries." He added that some mines have "ship counters" set to detonate after a specified number of vessels, which could cause mass destruction.
When remote surveys fail, mine disposal becomes a dangerous personal mission: clearance divers dive using equipment that reduces noise, bubbles and magnetic signatures to reach a suspicious object. The Navy employs underwater drones and side-scan sonar to map the seabed and precisely locate mines. These slow and painstaking operations delay the clearing of the strait and place additional pressure on international fleet coordination. In addition to military obstacles, logistical and economic constraints delay the resumption of commercial transit: the head of Mitsui OSK Lines warned that shipowners will not resume transits for at least weeks until they are convinced the agreement is real, while the International Maritime Organization continues to assess safety and create safe corridors for crew evacuations. Given that about one fifth of the world's energy supplies pass through the strait, mine clearance remains a decisive factor in delaying the restoration of confidence, and a full resumption of shipping will take weeks before returning to normal.
Comments on the news
What is the exact geographic width of the Strait of Hormuz and why is it considered vulnerable to mining? - The Strait of Hormuz is about 33 kilometers (21 nautical miles) wide at its narrowest point. However, the navigable channels available for large tankers are much narrower — about 3–5 kilometers in each direction. This narrowness makes the strait vulnerable to mining, since a small number of mines can block or seriously impede transits, especially where maneuvering is limited. The water depth in the strait is sufficient to use various types of mines, and heavy traffic (about 20–30% of global oil shipments) creates additional risks.
Why does Iran use naval mines as an asymmetric deterrent, and what other Iranian military doctrines affect regional security? - Iran uses naval mines as an asymmetric tool because its naval forces are significantly smaller and less technologically advanced than the US Navy and its allies. Mines are cheap, simple to deploy and can effectively disrupt commerce or military operations. This is part of a broader Iranian doctrine of "unequal warfare" (or "asymmetric deterrence"), which also includes fast attack boats, anti-ship missiles (including the Noor and Khalij-Fars), drones and small submarines. All these means aim to create "denial zones" for an adversary without engaging superior forces directly.
What is the history of tensions between Iran and the US in the Strait of Hormuz, and what previous mine incidents have occurred in the region? - Tensions have a long history, dating back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Key incidents include Operation Praying Mantis (1988), when the US struck Iranian oil platforms after an American frigate was damaged by a mine; the 2019 series of attacks on tankers off the UAE coast, for which the US and Saudi Arabia blamed Iran (which denied involvement). The most notable mine incident occurred in 1987 when an Iranian mine damaged the US frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts, prompting a large-scale mine-clearing operation. During the "Tanker War" (1984–1988), Iran actively mined approaches to Kuwaiti and Saudi ports, causing catastrophic consequences for civilian shipping.
Full version: مضيق هرمز.. لماذا يتطلب استئناف الملاحة أسابيع رغم اتفاق وقف الحرب؟